Sunday, July 22, 2012

My Favorite Consultant Is At It Again

http://davesaunders.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/mudcat-takes-up-cantor-challenge/


Dave "Mudcat" Saunders has taken up with a long shot candidate..again.  As you might know, Saunders is the political mastermind behind Mark Warner's successful run for the Senate.  Warner, then a political nobody and Virginia outsider, used Saunder's backwoods know-how to amble and ramble his way into the seat.  This time Saunders has undertaken Wayne "Not Collin" Powell who is running against Eric Cantor for the 7th Congressional District.  This is great for those of us who pull for the political underdog, and like to see incumbents kicked out, but...but there could be a problem.
Mudcat Saunder
Wayne "Not Collin" Powell
The TEA party came into office in a tidal wave.  No one can deny that.  Cantor is fringe TEA (I think..hell I don't really care), but unlike the rest of the TEA Partiers he had some experience in government making him an exception.  It would be great to see Cantor gone. He has gained nearly enough power to make me scared and I (technically, as I made aware to the Roanoke County Police officer before he chewed me out about it) do not live in Virginia. I have started to question Cantor as a so called "Young Gun" that is out for the common sense for the common good.  He has, like many politicians seeking larger roles, fallen in line with the House Republicans and votes accordingly.  Who can really blame him?  Step too far out of line and they might replace your closeted TEA Party butt out of office for a "true American" TEA Partier.

Eric "I'm not sure I have a nickname" Cantor

Despite Cantor's flaws, there is one thing he has in his favor. Experience. And Cantor should run on it.  My point in bringing up the TEA Party is that it came in with people who generally had no political experience.  Some had time in state government, but many had not so much as run for dog catcher before getting involved in the "grassroots" movement known as the TEA Party.  John Q. Public loved the darlings for it too.  We heard how they were going to kick all the foogies out of Washington and take back our country.  As we now see the problem lies in the fact that that they kicked out all the foogies and took over the country.  Now Congress is deadlocked and no one will budge.  Why? Because Democrats are scared stiff less they will get thrown out for dealing with the TEA Party, and what is left of the Republican party is afraid of sitting in the catbird seat with some guy in a tri-cornered hat waving a Gadsden Flag right on his tail.  The other reason Washington has ground to a halt is for lack willingness on the TEA Party's to budge.  Either they lack the political skill to reach a compromise or they simply will not.  This first option is cured with a heavy dose of experience....and gin.

All TEA Partiers Bow To The Almighty Gadsden

The overarching problem with the TEA Party was not the TEA Party itself (although I would say they have a few) it is the average citizen.  What John Q. Public fails to understand (que Thomas Jefferson rolling in grave) is that it does take some time to get the job of governing done.  Think of the United States as a big boat.  Does it turn on a dime? No! So why does Average-Joe American think that a new wave of freshly minted politicians is going to help.  I would equate it to kicking the captain of that very large boat out, and replacing it with a pimple faced kid who once drove a hover boat on Mario-Kart (do they have hover-boats on Mario-Kart? Does anyone play Mario-Kart anymore?) It is not going to end well.  Thus the TEA Party is left with no possible answer to the question "I thought yall were going to change the way government works, what happened?" expect to blame the Democrats or President Obama.  Those responses lead to a second set of issues. Niether option is a healthy way to govern.  Add all that together, sprinkle in the a dash of Mitt "No Chance" Romney and you are left with the TEA Party having to learn how to compromise..which they won't. Meanwhile back at the ranch, America's government is stalled on the tracks and there seems to be a increasingly loud rumble.

Thomas "Dangit Yall've Messed This Up" Jefferson

I am by no advocating for leaving ineffective law markers in office (in fact I like to see new people), but a certain level of experience is needed to navigate the tricky waters of the  national government.  Such experience is best gained in lower levels of government where the passion of the people is (and if not should) be best shown.  Leaders would best be served with a few years on the town council where they learn the skills of compromise.  Their actions taken under the careful eyes of an educated populous, at the ready to huffy and puffy is something goings wrong.  Granted the House of Representatives is prone to the winds of change more so than the Senate, we must be careful not to blow so hard the fruit falls off.  In the same line, whomever is President does feel the breeze but there is no need for a jacket.  The boys and girls over at the Supreme Court don't even know what wind is, and that is the way it should be.  Kicking bad government out is what Americans do best. It's in our DNA. What we have to do is carefully select what bad government is, identify who is at fault and replace them with competent people.  It takes some homework on the part of the people, but it is worth it.


Friday, July 20, 2012

There Is A Winner In The Shooting, But You Will Not Like It

What you are about to read is not a down play of the terrible shooting that took place early this morning in Aurora, Colorado.  I send prayers of comfort to those who witnessed, and were effected physically by the act of a heartless man. It is, however, as set of question that have arisen in my watching the news coverage and thinking deeply about the world in which we live.  

Moderates, there is a winner in the shooting that occurred in Aurora, Colorado and I hate to say so.  Nearly as soon as any coverage came on the airwaves there was an immediate speculation as to if it was a terrorist act.  I am not preaching a gospel of the crazies, but the terrorist have won and will continue to if every time a tragic event is accompanied with suppositions of a fundamentalist Islamic terrorist plot. Please do not assume that I am naive enough to think that we as a country do not face further attacks, but I am also not naive enough to fall in the trap laid out to convince me terrorist had something to do with such an act.

There comes a time that the Islamic terrorist threat of needs to be ignored and a time for it to considered.  For awhile, after 9/11, it was totally reasonable that we as a country remain alert to possible attacks, but more than 10 years is a little overboard.  If there is sufficient, credible evidence that we need to be prepared, then by all mean we shall prepare.  The post 9/11, overhauled intelligence community has been proven time and again the main terror threat to the United States is that of digital and cyber attack.  Why are we still continually worried terrorist are going to attack us in a physical, war-like action?  Again, intelligence has shown that the terrorist faced by the United States are adaptive by nature and will not do the same thing twice.  We need to put away the torches and pitchforks and concentrate on checking our bank accounts for strange charges and looking into ways to back up critical information stored on computers.  As I watched coverage of today's events, I have asked this question over and over again: What makes us so certain the terrorist have the means to attack us as they did on 9/11?

One reason might just be the very places we are hearing about these events.  The news media still..still has to harp on every  tragic event that takes place, and plant the seeds of worry as to the nature of an event.  Was it a terror attack?  Was it not?  Did the assailant have ties to any radical groups?  Was there any reason to harm any of those harmed?  That is just too many questions to ask before any hard facts have been established.  Even more, those question are fodder for every "expert" in the country to hash out on the air.  I understand the need to flesh out what happened, but not to speculate.  My ideal news cast would answer the W's: Who, What, Where, and fact based Why? Do not ask questions that leave room for speculation.  After every event of a horrific nature, we the public fall victim to the 24 hour news cycle groaning out the same questions over and over and over emphasizing every bit of information gathered.  Answer the W's, give us fact based information and move to the next story. Maybe...just maybe..we might some good news squeezed in.

Secondly, what happened to the idea that person just go off the deep end and hurt innocent people?  Could it be that the suspect of a crime was on some sort of the many drugs (illegal and legal) available on today's market? Maybe he had psychological disabilities that inhibited his ability to discern right from wrong?  Maybe the person wished to die, and thought that "death by cop" had a grandiose ring to it?  We might never know, but is it a fair assumption that  most suspects are not a terrorist of a radical Islamic persuasion?  The sooner we realize that there are clinically insane people amongst us, the better me might be able to treat those people.  If appropriate treatment for those who have psychological disabilities was more of a priority in this county, it might end up with  fewer "suspected terrorist." We certainly would have fewer tragic events like what took place in Colorado.

I am be no means a "If we don't ________ (insert action) then the terrorist win!" type, but such an event begs the question: Haven't the terrorist won? If we get so worked up about ever shooting, bank robbery or bridge collapse, then we are facing near constant turmoil in our lives.  It is a proven fact that the 9/11 attacks were designed and carried out to create the very fear that we now live under.  This fear has permeated our society to the point that every terrible event needs to have the "THIS WAS NOT A ACT OF TERROR" stamp of approval before the people put away the torches and pitchforks.  The fear of attack that we supposedly we live under is not healthy for us the American citizen, and it is certainly not good for our standing in the world.  We, the average public, need to reexamine (I would argue constantly) where we get our news, checking every fact and consider every source.  In addition to an ever present vigil on the media, we need to carry out a serious overhaul of how we identify and treat those with psychological disorders in our country.  Will these actions negate the perpetual speculation of the 24 hour news media? I doubt it, put perhaps we might sleep easier at night, and those around the world who wish ill on us will think twice when trying to strike fear in the hearts of average Americans.

Cool Little Test

http://www.isidewith.com/

I was surprised by my results

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

You Won't Be Sleeping Much At Night Anyway

http://www2.tricities.com/news/2012/jun/15/construction-meadowview-truck-stop-could-begin-ear-ar-1989479/

It appears that the Washington County (VA) Board Of Supervisors has put an end to the campaign to stop the Love's Truckstop in Meadowview, but they might regret it.  Though there have been concessions added to the contract and strict environmental guidelines, there will be unforeseen consiquences for Meadowview.  Once the newness of the truckstop wears off, there is going to be a good many Meadowview residents that will have stars in their eyes...though they won't be celestial.

As I, and many others, have argued that truckstops and other such businesses have a detrimental effect on a local economy.  After the initial burst of money for start ups, the money spent in Meadowview will slow to a steady flow OUT of the county. There strings a long line of localities that have seen this happen, and Meadowview, despite the concessions, will be added to it.

What struck me the most was the comment made by a local citizen about being able to sleep at night for thoughts of a child being hurt by the truckstop.  What I foresee is the citizen not being able to sleep, but not for a guilty conscience. To make my point I ask a simple question: How many private residents have to seen located around a truckstop on a busy interstate?  Once the truckstop arrives in Meadowview, it will no longer be the peaceful community that attracts retirees and young families.

If Meadowview wants a truck stop, as it has shown it does, it will get it soon enough.  Along with the shiny new toy glow there will be another glow, but it won't be one you can go to sleep easy by.

Monday, July 16, 2012

Show Review: The Newsroom

If you call yourself a political junkie, then you need to be watching this show. The show premiered June 24th,  but I have just now jumped on board.  For this fact, I am sorry.  I have now declared THE NEWSROOM my stay over until SCANDAL comes back on, and both shows will tide me over until THE WEST WING makes it triumphant return...though that might be a bad thing since Aaron Sorkin has put that wonderful dragon to rest for good and it coming back might be the only sign of the Apocalypse that I pay attention to.  From bashing the TEA Party, or grappling with the 2nd Amendment, THE NEWSROOM has it all.

THE NEWSROOM has all the political drama that THE WEST WING had, though it is not a boilerplate by any means.  All of the fast talking, twist and turns that we came to know and love on THE WEST WING are present and Sorkin has brought back all the thrills.  THE NEWSROOM has a few things in its favor.  Rather than having events show up that are similar to real events as THE WEST WING, THE NEWSROOM has true to life action that allows the viewer to relive reactions to them. To me, this makes THE NEWSROOM more organic and gripping.

Where THE WEST WING was based on four or five central figures that spin around each other, THE NEWSROOM has one key figure for which the world orbits.  This lends to a unique point of view. You are forced to see which way the neck is turning the head.  THE WEST WING left you watching the show with your eyes in different directions, which could at times leave you excused.

THE NEWSROOM does have it faults.  The first being Jane Fonda who seems to be getting paid to watch other great actor apply their craft.  Many might say "give it a rest! The 60's are over" but frankly I have never been Jane Fonda fan.  Treason is a serious crime and she is in every sense guilty of it. She does not redeem herself in this character either.  While many could argue Martin Sheen did very little on THE WEST WING, Fonda does even less on THE NEWSROOM.  In the episodes I have seen, Fonda is on screen for a 1/4 of the show and utters 5 to 10 lines.  The rest of the time she is sits with a blank stare on her face.

Finally, there seems to be more focus on the lives of the characters than that of  THE WEST WING.  This distracts you to some degree.  THE WEST WING always gave you bits and pieces which made them all the more effective.  THE NEWSROOM has them upfront and center. Personally, I am not as interested in the personal stories.  If I were to have one complaint, it would be leave the sex out and make it more political.

All in all, THE NEWSROOM is great.  It is well written, well acted, and worthy of your political junkie approval.  It is no WEST WING, but it does not need to be.